[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: polychords: a working solution
From: |
James |
Subject: |
Re: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Feb 2012 01:54:40 +0000 |
Hello
On 18 Feb 2012, at 00:25, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 01:06:18AM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
>> Following the link to 7.2 Adding and editing snippets I read:
>> "If the new snippet uses new features that are not available in the
>> current LSR version, the snippet should be added to
>> ‘Documentation/snippets/new’ and a reference should be added to the
>> manual. ... "
>>
>> Is this sth a normal user can do?
>
> Not directly. A new user can create a snippet, but then it needs
> to go to a developer to add it. James Lowe would normally
> volunteer for that, but his village is stuck on 1.4 kb/s bandwidth
> at the moment.
>
This is still true - am at a friend's at the moment - however the very least
I'd suggest is to make a tracker item, put what you want and where in the
tracker, include any code etc. Screenshots are usually useful (keep them
small). I can then pick up the bits and pieces and make a snippet for the
Notation Reference assuming it's appropriate and/or ask questions, once I get
back from my holiday.
Tracker items are cheap and if I get hit by a bus, at least someone else will
have the information to do this in the future and it isn't lost. That's the
best short term solution for now I think.
James
Ps. you can send the request to bug list as an enhancement if you cannot add a
tracker. One of the bug squad will see it and create the request.
- Re: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Carl Sorensen, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Tim McNamara, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/05
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Jean-Alexis Montignies, 2012/02/05
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/16
- Re: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution,
James <=
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/18