[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: polychords: a working solution
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Feb 2012 00:11:01 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:09:21PM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> 2012/2/18 Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:
>
> > I'd approach this from a different direction. First of all - have a look at
> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/updating-lsr-to-a-new-version
huh, I'd completely forgotten that we had that.
> > As it stands now, I believe the files we know won't work under
> > the current development version are in
> > Documentation/snippets/new: when makeLSR is run, these
> > over-write the snippets downloaded from the LSR.
>
> Do youn mean the files from
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=tree;f=Documentation/snippets/new;h=5fc4874511a90a821ab3ee0f5eecf13efdd82b77;hb=HEAD
> ?
Yes.
-snip-
> Am I right that only these files need manual upgrade?
I didn't see anything wrong from a quick glance.
Also note that once LSR is running 2.14 and the snippets are
updated, some of the files in D/s/n can be removed. Once that's
done, and after 2.16 is out, the whole process needs to be
repeated to go from from 2.14->2.16, and then remove the other
files from D/s/n.
- Graham
- Re: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Jean-Alexis Montignies, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/19