Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution

[Thomas Morley]

Hi David,

2012/2/19 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> 2012/2/19 David Nalesnik <address@hidden>:
>>> Hi Harm,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  2) "correct" the syntax of the files you know have errors ready for that
>>>> move.  Which you do is up to you -  bear in mind that if you go for 2), 
>>>> then
>>>> it's possible that the work will be wasted if we struggle to get the LSR
>>>> updated.  However, you will at least be prepared.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If you'd like to go the route of updating syntax in the problem files to
>>> 2.14, then I'll be happy to take on part of the task.  Just let me know!
>>>
>>> -David
>>
>> I fixed already following files:
>>
>> Altering-the-number-of-stems-in-a-beam.ly
>>  I changed the old override-auto-beam-setting.
>>
>> automatic-beams-two-per-two-in-4-4-or-2-2-time-signature.ly
>>  I changed the old override-auto-beam-setting.
>>
>> coloring-individual-staff-lines.ly
>>  I added the definition for interval-translate from 2.12.3
>>  Better use an other fix?
>
> [...]
>
> Did you try using convert-ly?

yes. But without complete success in the mentioned files.

Cheers,
  Harm