Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution

[David Kastrup]

Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:

> 2012/2/19 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>
>> Did you try using convert-ly?
>
> yes. But without complete success in the mentioned files.

It may also be an idea to use this as input for improving the convert-ly
rules.  After all, they will presumably get exercised a lot more when
the next stable version gets out and/or the LSR moves on.

So if it is not too much work to collect triplets of "version #, before,
after convert-ly, after correct change", it might be a nice base for
looking how to improve the convertrules file.

-- 
David Kastrup