[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:10:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
David Nalesnik <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> So please check with the _current_ convert-ly. It has an option
>
> -t, --to=VERSION convert to VERSION [default: 2.15.31]
>
> for telling it at which version to stop. You don't need to let it
> run
> all through to 2.15.31.
>
> Any conversions that fail with _that_ convert-ly are worth further
> investigation.
>
> Thank you very much for this information--I didn't know about this
> option.
Sorry for the unnecessary work caused by not thinking about this
sufficiently from your point of view. And sorry for the "it does not
take a genius" tone of my previous message that was uncalled for, stupid
and offensive.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Carl Sorensen, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/20