[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:59:06 +0100 |
Hi,
in repeat-with-upbeat-and-different-durations-in-the-alternatives.ly (
= http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=490 ) I want to avoid the
warning, but I can't find a proper fix. All I can think of is crude
and ugly:
{
\repeat volta 2 {
\partial 4
e'4
c'2
}
\alternative {
{
f'4
}
{
\partial 2
a'2
}
}
c'1
}
%--- very crude and ugly work-around:
{
\repeat volta 2 {
\partial 4
e'4
c'2
}
\alternative {
{
f'4
}
{
\set Timing.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
\once \override NoteHead #'duration-log = #1
a'4
\unset Timing.measureLength
}
}
c'1
}
Suggestions?
Cheers,
Harm
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Hézaine, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/25
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/25
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Hézaine, 2012/02/25
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/26
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/26
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/26
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/26
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/26
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/26
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/27
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/27
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/27
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/28