Re: Thinking about putting together a grant to support development on LilyPond

[David Kastrup]

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> writes:

> Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
>
>>> A) Development of ly2xml
>>
>> Reviewers would probably argue that this is not really scientific
>> research and should be funded by an industry partner instead.
>
> Some may even note that the hardest part of this has already been
> prototyped as part of schikkers list and argue Possible === Trivial
> === Worthless ;-)

Proven possible ==> not a research item.  Worthless?  Just ask Microsoft
and Apple how worthless it is to repackage existing possibilities and
prototypes.

-- 
David Kastrup