lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question about missing accidentals, and banishing stems


From: Robert Schmaus
Subject: Re: Question about missing accidentals, and banishing stems
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:08:05 +0200

of course - the correct approach would have been to transpose the whole
staff instead of just a bar ... 10 points go to spain, I guess ...


On Tue, Mar 27, 2012, at 09:27 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2012/3/27 Robert Schmaus <address@hidden>:
>  The transposed version is absolute rubbish ...
> 
> Not so, if there is a key which is also transposed.  Keys are usually
> transposed too, right?
> 
> \score {
>  <<
>    \new Staff {
>      \clef treble
>      %\key f \major
>      \cadenzaOn
> 
>      \relative c' { \key f \major
>        c^\markup{ "forced accidentals" } ees fis bes
>        c, ees! fis! bes
>      }
> 
>      \bar "|"
>      \cadenzaOff
>      c' c' c' c' % reset the accidentals ...
> 
>      \cadenzaOn
>      \transpose c des \relative c' { \key f \major
>        c^\markup{ "forced accidentals + transposition" } ees fis bes
>        c, ees! fis! bes
>      }
> 
>    }
>  >>
> }
> 
> 
> -- 
> Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
> www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]