[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion for documentation: Easy path to datatype reference
|
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
|
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion for documentation: Easy path to datatype reference |
|
Date: |
Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:57:58 +0200 |
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:28 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jonathan Wilkes <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Well it's definitely a pain. My favorites are booleans, which require
>> one hash to denote scheme code, and one hash for the boolean. (Why
>> not one more hash, for good measure?)
>
> The character "#" would be written as ##\# when accessed from LilyPond.
> So what?
It's nothing you cannot live with, but i remember that when i was a
beginner, it confused me for... 2 months, i guess? Quite a long
irritation.
Janek