[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails |
Date: |
Sun, 20 May 2012 23:16:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Marcos da Silva Sampaio <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using a tremolo in a full bar. I used the code below, but it fails
> and I got this error message:
>
> Drawing systems...lilypond: ../flower/include/drul-array.hh:35: T&
> Drul_array<T>::at(Direction) [with T = double]: Assertion `d == 1 || d
> == -1' failed.
>
>
> { \repeat tremolo 16 { ees32 a } }
>
> There is no problem without the accidental:
>
> { \repeat tremolo 16 { e32 a } }
>
>
> Lilypond fails in the same way when I use cautionary accidentals also:
>
> { \repeat tremolo 16 { e32 a! } }
>
>
> Am I doing anything wrong?
The only wrong thing I can detect is not reporting this to the
lilypond-bug list, but it would seem like you can easily fix that.
An "assertion failed" should not be triggerable with unadorned user code
not touching the Scheme layer.
--
David Kastrup
- Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails, Marcos da Silva Sampaio, 2012/05/20
- Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails, Eluze, 2012/05/20
- Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails, Colin Hall, 2012/05/20
- Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails, Colin Hall, 2012/05/24
- Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails, Keith OHara, 2012/05/25
- Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails, Janek Warchoł, 2012/05/25
- Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails, Colin Hall, 2012/05/25
- Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails, Janek Warchoł, 2012/05/25
- Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails, David Kastrup, 2012/05/25
- Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails, Janek Warchoł, 2012/05/26
- Re: Full bar tremolo with accidentals fails, Colin Hall, 2012/05/25