lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Appreciation / Financial support


From: Marc Hohl
Subject: Re: Appreciation / Financial support
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 21:09:13 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1

Am 30.05.2012 00:02, schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
Am 2012-05-29 um 20:07 schrieb David Kastrup:

If it is for easy user scripting: Lua. Flexible, easy to learn,
especially designed for that purpose.

Yup.  And fast.  And easily mappable to a different language like
LilyPond.  String or symbol?  Not a choice you need to make, there are
only interned strings.  List, array, hashtable, records?  Not a choice
you need to make, there are only tables.  And so on.

Both have in common that there is a big user base,

Lua does not have such a large user base.  More like a fan base.
Python, in contrast, is solidly mainstream.

I dream of a chimera of LuaTeX and LilyPond, that would be ideal for my not-only-musical typesetting needs...
+1

(Well I know: patches were thoughtfully considered)

Despite the fact that lilypond-book is available, I try to include all textual information in my .ly files. if only the line breaking algorithm of TeX were available as a library ... ;-)

Regards,

Marc




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]