Re: musescore lands sponsoring?

[Urs Liska]

We'll think about this (and some more, when I'm back and we're ready with our 
current job ...). OK, Janek?
Best
Urs



"Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden> schrieb:

>On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> There are also a few advantages [of using MuseScore]:
>>
>> a) MusicXML export means the results are usable in a variety of
>notation
>>   programs making use of an open standard.
>
>Indeed, having MusicXML exprort can give Lily more popularity.
>
>> b) volunteers can be given a complete toolchain.  "You can use an
>editor
>>   of your choice" is about as helpful for the average musician as
>"You
>>   can use a lathe of your choice".
>
>LOL :D
>how true!  Valentin, that could be the next quote of the month :)
>
>> d) "I am well-versed in LilyPond.  What form do you want the entry
>in?
>>   Can I use music functions?  What note language should I be using?
>>   Should the voicing be reflected in ad-hoc voices?  Should I be
>using
>>   anonymous parallel voices?  What kind of context mods should I be
>>   using?"  "Uh, we better form a committee for that kind of
>question."
>
>Good point.
>
>That's why our KickStarter project (at least the first one) should be
>a not-very-long piece for chamber orchestra.  Or string quartet.
>Something with 3-6 staves and 5-15 pages.
>


>cheers,
>Janek
>
>PS there actually is one serious advantage of text input in a project
>like this: we could set up a git repository for it.
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.