[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stem across voices
From: |
-Eluze |
Subject: |
Re: stem across voices |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Jun 2012 13:15:59 -0700 (PDT) |
> My point was that it is impossible to play <e f>8 only on the 6th
> string of a guitar.
> But that should sound at the second quaver of the example following
> _exactly_ the notation of your example.
>
just another thought - if these notes have originally been written for
another instrument - let's say for a piano - and later it was transcribed:
does it not make sense sense to keep the original quarter (perhaps one could
parenthesize it…)? I believe the quarter rhythm is better marked with a
quarter note in analogy to the following quarters.
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/stem-across-voices-tp33953167p33954604.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: stem across voices, (continued)
- Re: stem across voices, Eluze, 2012/06/03
- Re: stem across voices, Thomas Morley, 2012/06/03
- Re: stem across voices, Eluze, 2012/06/03
- Re: stem across voices, Kieren MacMillan, 2012/06/03
- Re: stem across voices, Federico Bruni, 2012/06/03
- Re: stem across voices, Thomas Morley, 2012/06/03
- Re: stem across voices,
-Eluze <=
- Re: stem across voices, David Kastrup, 2012/06/03
- Re: stem across voices, David Kastrup, 2012/06/03
- Re: stem across voices, Janek Warchoł, 2012/06/03
Re: stem across voices, David Raleigh Arnold, 2012/06/03