[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tunefl and other web services
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: tunefl and other web services |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Jul 2012 21:55:29 +0200 |
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:41 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> The GNU Manifesto is also not a legal statement, but a philosophical
> one. LilyPond is a GNU project and thus has subscribed to this
> philosophy. I did not remember plans to change that, and it is not like
> it has served us badly.
If LilyPond must be used more and more as a server application, then
perhaps a switch to AGPL should be considered? (It only adds one
section.) Otherwise, the GPLv4 should (supposedly) merge the AGPL
requirement so the switch will probably occur naturaly any decade from
now :-)
By the way, another example of these "non-free" server-based
applications would be http://etudeapp.com.
Cheers,
Valentin.
Re: tunefl and other web services, Tim Roberts, 2012/07/05
- Re: tunefl and other web services, David Kastrup, 2012/07/05
- Re: tunefl and other web services,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: tunefl and other web services, David Kastrup, 2012/07/05
- Re: tunefl and other web services, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/07/06
- Re: tunefl and other web services, David Kastrup, 2012/07/06
- Re: tunefl and other web services, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/07/06
- Re: tunefl and other web services, David Kastrup, 2012/07/07
- Re: tunefl and other web services, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/07/07
- Re: tunefl and other web services, David Kastrup, 2012/07/07
- Re: tunefl and other web services, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/07/07
Re: tunefl and other web services, Mike Blackstock, 2012/07/11