Re: Regression test rater

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Janek Warchol" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: "LilyPond User Group" <address@hidden>; "Devel" 
<address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: Regression test rater


> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
> > First of all, thanks to those who have spent time and energy rating the
> > regression test at http://www.philholmes.net/lilypond/regtests/ - we're 
> > very
> > close to having a rating for all the tests.
> [...]
>
> "LilyPond Regression Test Rater
> Well - believe it or not, either you've reviewed ALL the LilyPond
> regtests, in which case thanks and please take a well earned rest, or
> other reviewers have given us good enough coverage already."
>
> wow!  Kudos!
> :)
> Janek

Don't get too excited.  It's a bug - it looks like every regtest has 
received a single rating, but we're going for 4 per regtest, to get a good 
average.  I'll fix it tomorrow....

--
Phil Holmes