Re: Regression test rater

[Trevor Daniels]

Phil Holmes wrote Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:03 PM

> Kind-of fixed.  The way the files are presented is aimed at ensuring no-one 
> rates a regtest more than once, and that they get the least-rated files 
> presented to them in a random order.  The only way I seem to be able to get 
> this to work is with nested SQL statements, and this is quite slow. The 
> alternative would be to make it simpler, so that users simply get files 
> which they haven't rated, with no ordering apart from that.  However, the 
> downside of this is that we may get lots of files with 4 ratings, but some 
> remain with only 1 until we've done the lot.  Let me know what you'd prefer, 
> fellow raters.

I'm getting load times of just less than 10 sec fairly 
consistently.  This seems quite acceptable.

Trevor