[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond syntax
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond syntax |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jul 2012 11:44:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> David Rogers <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> % It seems like Lilypond should be able to be smart enough to
>>> understand that something % like c1^"D.C. al Coda" is a written text
>>> instruction without needing \markup; % likewise \mark \markup seems
>>> inelegant and even redundant.
>>
>> In a way, I agree with you. But mainly I think this should be a
>> command instead of a markup - that a D.C. should be part of the logic
>> of Lilypond's repeat system and that the user should be supplying the
>> musical plan rather than the string of text to print.
>
> Are we talking about the same LilyPond?
>
> \relative c' { \mark "X" c1^"D.C. al Coda" }
>
> compiles quite fine for me.
Sorry: the above is not really a comment on your "D.C. should be part of
the logic" (which I actually agree with), but about the original
"LilyPond should be smart enough" statement.
--
David Kastrup