[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dynamics (and hairpins) attached to rests vs dynamics attached to no
From: |
Tiresia GIUNO |
Subject: |
Re: dynamics (and hairpins) attached to rests vs dynamics attached to notes |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:30:07 +0200 |
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
eluze <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Tiresia Giuno wrote
> >
> >
> >
> > The attached examples are quite simple, in my score with more
> > complex music, such behavior leads to quite strange situations.
> >
> > Am I right and if so, which would be the easiest solution?
> >
> >
>
> probably the simplest is to use dynamic contexts and withdraw the
> dynamic engraver in the normal staff:
>
> musicOne = { a'4 \< ~ a'\pppp ~ a'\> r4 \! }
>
> <<
> \new Staff \musicOne
> \new Dynamics \musicOne
> >>
>
> \layout {
> ragged-right = ##f
> \context {
> \Voice
> \remove New_dynamic_engraver
> }
> }
>
>
> this way you can reuse the same voice/staff with the dynamics in it
> (of course you can also use a separate voice with spacers for the
> dynamics…)
>
> hth
> Eluze
Thanks for your answer!
I avoid using the Dynamics Context, because it places dynamics far away
from the staff (even if with LP 2.15 it looks much better)- and hairpins
are still slightly misaligned, see attached file.
I can't really remove the New_dynamic_engraver, because it is an
orchestral score, and I would loose the dynamics for the other
instruments.
Thanks, TG
test-dynamics-2.14.png
Description: PNG image
test-dynamics-2.15.png
Description: PNG image