[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: beam across larger rest
From: |
David Nalesnik |
Subject: |
Re: beam across larger rest |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Sep 2012 18:10:26 -0500 |
Hi David,
> 2012/9/4 David Bobroff <address@hidden>:
>> In this example I have a beam going across a rest larger than the beam
>> value.
>>
>> \version "2.16.0"
>>
>> \relative {
>> { d16-[ r r8 e16-] r r8 }
>> }
>>
>> The 16th beam breaks over the 8th rest. Is it possible to extend the
>> 16th beam across the 8th rest like this?:
You can play around with an override to the 'beaming property of the
individual stems under the beam (and create ridiculous results while
you're trying to figure out how it works!)
This gets you the effect in the image:
\version "2.16.0"
\relative {
{ d16-[
\override Stem #'beaming = #'((1 0) 1 0)
r r8
\revert Stem #'beaming
e16-] r r8 }
}
If I'm understanding it correctly, this means for the second and third
"stems," you are specifying two beams to left and right. 0 is the top
beam, and 1 is the beam next in toward the note.
HTH,
David
- beam across larger rest, David Bobroff, 2012/09/04
- Re: beam across larger rest, Thomas Morley, 2012/09/04
- Re: beam across larger rest,
David Nalesnik <=
- Re: beam across larger rest, Nick Payne, 2012/09/04
- Re: beam across larger rest, David Bobroff, 2012/09/05
- Re: beam across larger rest, Tiresia GIUNO, 2012/09/05
- Re: beam across larger rest, Federico Bruni, 2012/09/05
- Re: beam across larger rest, Tiresia GIUNO, 2012/09/05
- Re: beam across larger rest, Federico Bruni, 2012/09/05
- Re: beam across larger rest, Tiresia GIUNO, 2012/09/05
- Re: beam across larger rest, David Bobroff, 2012/09/05
- Re: beam across larger rest, Federico Bruni, 2012/09/05
Re: beam across larger rest, eluze, 2012/09/05