Re: partcombine and instrumentSwitch

[Jan-Peter Voigt]

Thank you, Harm and Keith for your solutions!
I will now introduce the layout solution in my include files :-)

Cheers,
Jan-Peter

On 14.09.2012 08:02, Keith OHara wrote:
> Jan-Peter Voigt <jp.voigt <at> gmx.de> writes:
>
> > I am using partcombine in a piece, wich makes use of instrumentSwitch.
> > Now this leads to a stack of 4 times "piccolo" in this example.
> > Is this a bug or am I missing something?
> > Is it maybe related to this issue 2253?
> It is different from issue 2253 because, even with multiple separate voices
> and no use of \partcombine, we would not want multiple individual "piccolo"
> indications.  This came up before at
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-11/msg00180.html
>
> You can use
>
> \layout {
>    \context {\Voice \remove "Instrument_switch_engraver" }
>    \context {\Staff \consists "Instrument_switch_engraver" }
> }
>
> And I will post a suggestion on the bug-tracker to make this the default,
> unless anyone here knows a reason to have instrument-change information set
> individually for each voice.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user