lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ambitus-Bug


From: PMA
Subject: Re: Ambitus-Bug
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 14:53:07 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101227 Iceape/2.0.11

Keith OHara wrote:
Knut Petersen<Knut_Petersen<at>  t-online.de>  writes:

Have a look at the attached source and the png, the problem is obvious.
The first appearance dictates which of the two enharmonic equivalents is
chosen for the ambitus.

Yes.  The ambitus was formerly sorted in staff-position order, and there
was a complaint a while back that if one has E-sharp and F-flat, the
ambitus shows the E-sharp, so it was changed to pitch order.

If one sets the actual tuning in LilyPond, so that she knows that E-sharp
is a slightly higher pitch than F, she will make the ambitus consistently.

Maybe not everyone agrees with me that E-sharp is a higher pitch than F.

LilyPond's default concept of pitch uses 12 equal divisions of the octave, so
the cases you show are ties.

Maybe by default LilyPond could break the ties based on staff-position,
which would be wrong to my way of thinking, but less surprising.


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Might \naturalizeMusic specifically target Ambitus?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]