|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: F-flat Key Signature |
Date: | Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:42:20 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 |
Am 19.09.2012 18:26, schrieb address@hidden:
But F flat _is_ different from E, especially in its relationship to other, 'normal' keys. F flat has a quite simple relation to G flat that might happen in real music. So I'm happy that LilyPond offers to explicitely write it down instead of refusing to do things, _she_ considers useless. Even if I'd probably never use it ...Hi, I have to agree with david. I studied music and piano and i never saw a piece composed with key-signature f-flat. It would be completly unreadable. Any musician would reject to study a piece with a double-flat in the key-signature. It's amazing that lilypond supports such strange things but from the practical point of view its useless. Just write e-major and the musicans will be thankfull ;-). Kind regards Michael
Best Urs
----- Originalnachricht ----- Von: David Rogers [mailto:address@hidden Gesendet: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 06:18 PM An: Lilypond-user <address@hidden> Betreff: Re: F-flat Key Signature keith Luke <address@hidden> writes:Does anyone know why the flats appear our of order when the key signature is F-flat?I'm really only summarizing what's been said: that it's probably already correct, that it's probably a bad idea to use it, and that the score is truly unreadable with the size mismatch between the staff and the things that are on it. I'd vote for E major in this section.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |