Re: Possible feature request for 'q' shorthand or tie syntax

[Werner LEMBERG]

>> So, i still think that we shouldn't allow "c2 4 4" despite some
>> really nice benefits it could bring us.
> 
> Well, it won't affect previously valid programs.  And it would have
> some nice side effects, including
>
>   c4~ | 1~ | 2.
>
> with or without bar checks or spaces, and reasonably straightforward
> underpinnings and semantics.

So let's keep that as one of the first results of our GLISS
discussion, together with your suggestions for improved syntax of
\tempo.


    Werner