[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Decrescendo on last note
From: |
Keith OHara |
Subject: |
Re: Decrescendo on last note |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Oct 2012 04:37:27 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Carlo Stemberger <carlo.stemberger <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> Keith OHara <k-ohara5a5a <at> oco.net> writes:
>
> > There is also \endSpanners
> >
> > { \endSpanners b1\> }
>
> Another question: how to get something like [...] \pp at
> the end?
\endSpanners will not do, because it only tells LilyPond the decrescendo
should end on the next not (which is conventionally printed as ending at
the bar-line if the next note would be in the next bar).
The new dynamic is not printed under the next note, but some fraction
of the way along the current note.
I guess there is good reason the manual shows the method with
simultaneous streams of music; it is more generally useful.
\new Voice << b1 {s2.-\tweak #'minimum-length #5 \> s4\pp} >>
- Decrescendo on last note, Carlo Stemberger, 2012/10/01
- Re: Decrescendo on last note, Keith OHara, 2012/10/02
- Re: Decrescendo on last note, Stemby, 2012/10/02
- Re: Decrescendo on last note, Carlo Stemberger, 2012/10/02
- Re: Decrescendo on last note, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/10/02
- Re: Decrescendo on last note,
Keith OHara <=
- Re: Decrescendo on last note, Carlo Stemberger, 2012/10/03
- Re: Decrescendo on last note, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/03
- Re: Decrescendo on last note, Jay Anderson, 2012/10/03
- Re: Decrescendo on last note, David Kastrup, 2012/10/03
Re: Decrescendo on last note, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/10/02