lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "Parallel music view" - inspiration for LilyPond editors.


From: Francois Planiol
Subject: Re: "Parallel music view" - inspiration for LilyPond editors.
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 05:34:55 -0500

I think MTX was doing that (or PMX?). I used it and would counsel to
try it there. If you find it usefull, why not?
Personally, I am happy with writing down on paper and transcribing
then (when the music becomes to complicated form my poor coding
habits).
Francois

2012/10/3, David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Am 03.10.2012 10:12, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> Am 03.10.2012 07:34, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> sorry for delay...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>> Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>>> Disabling automatic line wrapping and using horizontal scrolling
>>>>>>> is the key :)
>>>>>>> Of course, it wouldn't probably make sense to *store* music in
>>>>>>> this format.
>>>>>> If you don't want to store it in this format, there is no point in
>>>>>> choosing a display form that locally resembles valid input.
>>>>> why?
>>>>> The idea is to make /working/ with the code easier.
>>>> I'd say from David's POV it wouldn't even make sense to have syntax
>>>> highlighting, isn't it?
>>>> And I think we _all_ agree that it's way easier to work with colored
>>>> code ...
>>> Do you really consider ad hominem attacks a useful contribution to the
>>> discussion?  You wrote nothing except the above in the middle of a full
>>> unabridged quote of Janek's entire mail.
>>>
>> I didn't consider this an attack.
>
> First you make up an unrelated claim you attribute to me, and then you
> do an "I think we all agree that this claim of David is silly".
>
> That's the entirety of your contribution.
>
>> And I just wanted to make a single point to support Janek's argument,
>> therefore I only made a single comment.
>>
>> I referenced your name to reference the context of my comment.
>
> Of course.
>
>> If you feel somehow insulted by this I have to apologize.
>
> I consider it more an insult to the intellect of your targeted audience.
> It is obvious that you were not trying to persuade me.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]