lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: dashed ties and line breaks


From: Thomas Morley
Subject: Re: dashed ties and line breaks
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 15:01:43 +0100

2012/11/4 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> David Nalesnik <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I show both versions below.  (Note that running convert-ly on an older
>> file will update the syntax automatically.)

Hi David(s),

@ David (N)
there is a copy/paste error

>> \version "2.16.0"
>>
>> \relative c'' {
>>   \once \alterBroken Tie #'dash-definition #'( ((0 1 0.4 0.75)) ((0 1 1 1)) )
>> % or \once \alterBroken Tie #'dash-definition #'( ((0 1 0.4 0.75)) ()

                         ^^^^^
>> % or  \once \alterBroken Tie #'dash-definition #'( ((0 1 0.4 0.75)) )
>>  )
   ^^^^^
>>   c1~
>>   \break
>>   c
>> }
>>

should read:

\version "2.16.0"

\relative c'' {
  \once \alterBroken Tie #'dash-definition #'( ((0 1 0.4 0.75)) ((0 1 1 1)) )
% or
% \once \alterBroken Tie #'dash-definition #'( ((0 1 0.4 0.75)) () )
% or
% \once \alterBroken Tie #'dash-definition #'( ((0 1 0.4 0.75)) )
  c1~
  \break
  c
}

Works as expected.

[...]

> Or, of course, the version as a tweak, not requiring you to specify "Tie":
>
> \version "2.17.6"
>
> \relative c'' {
>   c1-\alterBroken dash-definition #'( ((0 1 0.4 0.75)) ((0 1 1 1)) )
>      ~
>   c1~
>   \break
>   c
> }

@ David (K)
Sorry, but with this coding no dashed Tie is printed and the terminal returns:

warning: not a spanner

     ~


>
> It will still be a bit of work before the - before \alterBroken becomes
> optional.
>
> --
> David Kastrup

-Harm



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]