|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release |
Date: | Sat, 10 Nov 2012 19:53:54 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 |
Hi all, I'm happy (and also proud) to be able to announce a new release of my lilyglyphs LaTeX package. While I label it version 0.2 I am convinced that it is the first release that is really useable, so I consider this the initial 'public' release. The package provides (Xe)LaTeX access to notational elements from LilyPond. Anything that can be created with LilyPond can now be included in the continuous text of LaTeX documents. All glyphs from the Emmentaler font can be printed directly, anything else (e.g. Notes with stems and flags, which aren't available as glyphs but are drawn explicitely by LilyPond) through the detour of LilyPond's 'preview' output. This isn't a competitor for lilypond-book but a completely different approach, and both will complement very well. While lilypond-book is there for including complete staves as musical examples, lilyglyphs includes the notational elements at the level of characters within the textual line. If you use both you can have the same LilyPond style in the continuous text and in musical examples. There are two major leaps since version 0.1:
I would be happy if the package is of use for many people writing
(about) music. lilyglyphs is available from https://github.com/lilyglyphs/lilyglyphs (new address!), the direct link to the current manual is https://github.com/downloads/lilyglyphs/lilyglyphs/lilyglyphs-v0.2.0.pdf The recommended way to get it is to clone it from GitHub (or even better: fork it and clone the fork in order to be able to directly contribute), but there is also a downloadable archive available.
PS: I'd appreciate any hints about a LaTeX group where I can
expect musically inclined users to be around in considerable
numbers |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |