[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: TupletNumber direction
From: |
Daniel Rosen |
Subject: |
RE: TupletNumber direction |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Nov 2012 22:59:58 +0000 |
Well, that's what I meant when I said that I can't speak to whether the code
was good--I don't know what kind of stuff to check for. But I do personally
think the functionality is useful.
DR
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Morley [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 5:57 PM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: David Nalesnik; David Kastrup; address@hidden
Subject: Re: TupletNumber direction
2012/11/11 Daniel Rosen <address@hidden>:
> I can't speak to whether the code is sound, but if it is, this should be
> added to the LSR. Quite frankly, I'm surprised something similar isn't there
> already.
>
> DR
Do you really think it's usefull?
As soon as polyphonic occurs, it will produce weird output (I think, not
tested).
-Harm
- Re: TupletNumber direction, (continued)
- Re: TupletNumber direction, David Kastrup, 2012/11/11
- RE: TupletNumber direction, Daniel Rosen, 2012/11/11
- RE: TupletNumber direction, Daniel Rosen, 2012/11/11
- Re: TupletNumber direction, David Kastrup, 2012/11/11
- Re: TupletNumber direction, David Nalesnik, 2012/11/11
- RE: TupletNumber direction, Daniel Rosen, 2012/11/11
- Re: TupletNumber direction, David Nalesnik, 2012/11/11
- Re: TupletNumber direction, Thomas Morley, 2012/11/11
- RE: TupletNumber direction, Daniel Rosen, 2012/11/11
- Re: TupletNumber direction, Thomas Morley, 2012/11/11
- RE: TupletNumber direction,
Daniel Rosen <=
- Re: TupletNumber direction, David Kastrup, 2012/11/12
- RE: TupletNumber direction, Daniel Rosen, 2012/11/13