[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Nov 2012 01:15:54 +0100 |
2012/11/11 Urs Liska <address@hidden>:
> Well, nobody stops you from beautifying the revision report as well ;-)
>
> But seriously, if you are looking for something to play with, you can take
> that document too - with credits to Git ...
>
> Best
> Urs
> --
> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
>
>
>
> "Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden> schrieb:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > I'm happy (and also proud) to be able to announce a new release of my
>> > lilyglyphs LaTeX package.
>> > While I label it version 0.2 I am convinced that it is the first release
>> > that is really useable, so I consider this the initial 'public' release.
>>
>> Congratulations - this is really great work! I wish i had some LaTeX
>> documents with musical symbols to typeset so that i could play with it
>> :)
>>
>> thanks,
>> Janek
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
Hi Urs,
btw, I recently wished to link to your LilyPond tutorial, announced here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-08/msg00450.html
Couldn't find it anymore.
Cancelled? Link changed?
Thanks,
Harm
Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Damian leGassick, 2012/11/15