Re: Slurs, phrasing slurs and fingering

[Thomas Morley]

2012/12/3 Noeck <address@hidden>:
>
>
> Am 03.12.2012 00:29, schrieb David Nalesnik:
>
>>> \acciaccatura { e-\! } d4 \shape PhrasingSlur #'((0 . 1) (0 . 1.8) (0 . 1.8)
>>> (0 . 0))
>>>
>>
>> Nick has given you the new syntax (as of 2.17.4).
>>
>> -David
>
> Why has that been inverted? To me, \shape PhrasingSlur #… is easier to
> read than \shape #… PhrasingSlur. Could someone briefly explain the
> reason for that?
>
> Cheers,
> Joram
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Hi Joram,

AFAIR, the main reason was to achieve the possibility to use shape as
a tweak. So one has to make sure, that the last argument of the
function could be music.

2.16.1
shape =
#(define-music-function (parser location grob offsets)
   (string? list?)

2.17.6
shape =
#(define-music-function (parser location offsets item)
   (list? symbol-list-or-music?)


Cheers,
  Harm