[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Displaying string number above fingering
From: |
Keith OHara |
Subject: |
Re: Displaying string number above fingering |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Dec 2012 05:39:00 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Keith OHara <k-ohara5a5a <at> oco.net> writes:
>
> > The irregular behavior Oliver sees occurs when there is no <> chord
> > indication.
>
> Fingering_engraver
Well, fingerings go to Fingering_engraver but the string-numbers go to
New_fingering_engraver. (Better than version 2.14, when string-numbers they
were simply dropped.) I opened bug-tracker issue
<http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3017>
> > Then there is the problem \thumb is different than other fingerings...
>
> We should likely try doing something about that, though.
I see no urgency, since there was a very similar bug-report
<http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1029>
satisfied to everyone's satisfaction. Making \thumb like the other fingerings
would still give wrong output for Olivier's example (just wrong in a more
regular way).
- Displaying string number above fingering, Olivier Biot, 2012/12/11
- Re: Displaying string number above fingering, Nathan, 2012/12/11
- Re: Displaying string number above fingering, Olivier Biot, 2012/12/11
- Re: Displaying string number above fingering, David Kastrup, 2012/12/12
- Re: Displaying string number above fingering, Nick Payne, 2012/12/12
- Re: Displaying string number above fingering, Eluze, 2012/12/12
- Re: Displaying string number above fingering, Keith OHara, 2012/12/12
- Re: Displaying string number above fingering, David Kastrup, 2012/12/12
- Re: Displaying string number above fingering,
Keith OHara <=
- Re: Displaying string number above fingering, Olivier Biot, 2012/12/14
- Re: Displaying string number above fingering, Keith OHara, 2012/12/13
Re: Displaying string number above fingering, Eluze, 2012/12/14