lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Woodwind Fingering diagrams problem


From: Wim van Dommelen
Subject: Re: Woodwind Fingering diagrams problem
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:54:45 +0100

Minimal example attached, in diagram 3 lots of keys are gone.

On 28 Jan 2013, at 12:03 , Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:

On 01/28/2013 11:34 AM, Jeffrey Trevino wrote:
It should be pointed out that it's a common notational practice to hide the
unused non-center keys in fingering diagrams; this behavior is idiomatic.

Common, but not ubiquitous or standard, I'd say.

Agreed, but for a series showing e.g. a scale it would be nice to have similar diagrams, so I would like to control the behaviour myself.

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Eluze wrote:
please send your code, the version number and everything needed to reproduce
this behavior!

I think versions are irrelevant here.  Whether you're talking 2.14 or 2.16 or 2.17, there's no indication in the docs how to get a fingering diagram to display all keys -- unless you're trying to display an empty diagram, e.g.:

\woodwind-diagram
        #'clarinet
        #'()

But the moment you start indicating keys to press in the second argument, the diagram hides keys other than those in the region of interest.

Indeed, see also my minimal example attached.

Since the docs don't mention any alternative, it seems impossible other than by delving into the source to tell whether an alternative option is built in to allow you to display all keys.

I was already searching there (in the .scm-files) because in the "low-bass-clarinet" there are also still some keys missing (depending on the brand and model you use) but that involves more Scheme knowledge....

Regards,
Wim.

Attachment: BCL-fingers-minimal.ly
Description: Binary data

Attachment: BCL-fingers-minimal.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]