[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: add9 chords
From: |
Robert Schmaus |
Subject: |
Re: add9 chords |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Feb 2013 08:49:31 +0100 |
Hi Bart,
> - c:9 produces a C9, including the seventh, (sorry Robert Schmaus, I just
> tested it)
Oh ... I think there have been some changes from the previous stable
version (2.14) then. I had the problem that I could *not* produce 11 or
9 chords - I always got the "add9" or "add11" version, until somebody
informed me that I need to specify the full chord, including the 7.
Now (in version 2.16 and 2.17), we have
* c : 9 produces <c e g bf d'> and the chord name is C9
* c : 7.9 produces the same
* c : 9^7 produces <c e g d'> (but the chord name still is C9 - you can
check this on http://lilybin.com/jtiz8e/1 )
I liked the old way better. Sure, it's cumbersome to write c : 7.9.11.13
for a 13 chord, but at least there was full control over the chord.
At the very least, c : 9^7 should not be called C9. And, again, it used
to be that way in previous versions.
Best,
Robert
- Re: add9 chords, (continued)
- Re: add9 chords, Jan Kohnert, 2013/02/06
- Re: add9 chords, Robert Schmaus, 2013/02/06
- Re: add9 chords, Noeck, 2013/02/06
- Re: add9 chords, bart deruyter, 2013/02/06
- Re: add9 chords, Jan Kohnert, 2013/02/06
- Re: add9 chords, bart deruyter, 2013/02/06
- Re: add9 chords, Noeck, 2013/02/06
- Re: add9 chords, bart deruyter, 2013/02/06
- Re: add9 chords, Thomas Morley, 2013/02/06
- Re: add9 chords, Jan Kohnert, 2013/02/06
- Re: add9 chords,
Robert Schmaus <=
- Re: add9 chords, Noeck, 2013/02/07