[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:06:45 +0100 (CET) |
> \override Beam.Y-extent = #'(0 . 10)
> \override Beam.vertical-skylines =
> #ly:grob::simple-vertical-skylines-from-extents
Nice! And completely undocumented, of course...
What I want is something similar: Instead of having a rectangular
skyline, I want some `padding' (bad word here, I know): If a beam
looks like this
/|
/||
/||x
||x
|x
x
I want to have the top skyline like this:
/
/
/ /|
/||
/||x
||x
|x
x
Maybe
\override Beam.skyline-offsets = #'(0 . 10)
\override Beam.vertical-skylines =
#ly:grob::shift-vertical-skylines-by-offset
Especially for beams with a large slope this might be a better
approach and usable for many other grobs also, I believe.
Werner
PS: Even after looking at lilypond output compiled with
-ddebug-skylines='#t'
I don't understand what
\override Beam.skyline-horizontal-padding = #50
actually does. Can you please explain?
- collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/12
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/12
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Janek WarchoĊ, 2013/02/12
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13