[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:03:05 +0100 (CET) |
> Because when I started coding for the project, there was not a
> single use of MAKE_DOCUMENTED_SCHEME_CALLBACK whereas there are
> currently 276 uses of MAKE_SCHEME_CALLBACK.
Umpf. We still have *zero* use of MAKE_DOCUMENTED_SCHEME_CALLBACK, as
far as I can see. This macro refers to
MAKE_SCHEME_CALLBACK_WITH_OPTARGS, and there is a *single* function
(`interpret_markup') which actually has a real documentation string;
all others have "".
Sigh.
Werner
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, (continued)
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13