19th-cent. accidental notation

[Javier Ruiz-Alma]

The default accidental style notation in Lilypond omits the accidental 
on the 1st note of the following bar for _tied_ notes spanning to the 
next bar. NR says this has been the standard since 18th cent.

I found an accidental notation rule in 1803 music introductory textbook 
by M. Clementi, says accidental was also omitted on the following bar it 
when happened to be first note played of same pitch as prior bar 
accidental (explicit example shown involves non-tied notes).

Seemed intuitive in the context of several of the pieces (see attached 
sample), so I've been applying [\once \override Voice.Accidental 
#'stencil = ##f] as needed in the typeset.
Just wondered if there were some classical notation gurus that could 
educate me on how common this practice was (i.e. non-tied accidentals 
carrying over to first note of following bar).
Thx, Javier

sample-notation.png
Description: PNG image

accidental-rule.png
Description: PNG image