lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 19th-cent. accidental notation


From: Luca Rossetto Casel
Subject: Re: 19th-cent. accidental notation
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:48:41 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080227 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Il 17/02/2013 13:10, Javier Ruiz-Alma ha scritto:
I found an accidental notation rule in 1803 music introductory textbook by M. Clementi, says accidental was also omitted on the following bar it when happened to be first note played of same pitch as prior bar accidental (explicit example shown involves non-tied notes).

Dear Javier,
the approach you describe reflects actually the standard practice adopted in 18th century, and still used in the next one: alterations affect all the consecutive notes of the same pitch, until a different pitched note appears, regardless of the bar. So, alterations on non-consecutive notes of the same pitch must be repeated, although occurring in the same bar. In present editions, this notation is generally uniformed to the modern one - eventually putting the added alterations in parentheses or brackets.

    Luca


--
Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP 
autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it http://www.email.it/f

Sponsor:
Ami l'arte e vuoi arredare casa con stile? Su MisterCupido.com puoi acquistare 
le RIPRODUZIONI DEI QUADRI di: Van Gogh, Monet, Klimt, Modigliani, Cezanne, 
Hayez, Michelangelo, Raffaello, ecc
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=12386&d=17-2



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]