|
From: | Joseph Rushton Wakeling |
Subject: | Re: 19th-cent. accidental notation |
Date: | Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:24:05 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
On 02/18/2013 03:17 AM, Luca Rossetto Casel wrote:
Yes, in most cases brackets are indeed unnecessary. But I know some over-accurate editions that aim to reproduce the original text as faithfully as possible, giving evidence to every critical intervention - for example, the Ricordi critical edition of Verdi's works.
Well, Ricordi have a karma debt to pay after some of the very unfaithful editions they produced in the last century ... ;-)
Generally I think it's a good thing to be as clear as possible about editorial interventions, but I'm not sure that modernizing the _style_ of accidental placement really counts as an "intervention" in that sense.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |