lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 19th-cent. accidental notation


From: Joseph Rushton Wakeling
Subject: Re: 19th-cent. accidental notation
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:24:05 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/17.0.2

On 02/18/2013 03:17 AM, Luca Rossetto Casel wrote:
Yes, in most cases brackets are indeed unnecessary. But I know some
over-accurate editions that aim to reproduce the original text as faithfully as
possible, giving evidence to every critical intervention - for example, the
Ricordi critical edition of Verdi's works.

Well, Ricordi have a karma debt to pay after some of the very unfaithful editions they produced in the last century ... ;-)

Generally I think it's a good thing to be as clear as possible about editorial interventions, but I'm not sure that modernizing the _style_ of accidental placement really counts as an "intervention" in that sense.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]