[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: Hushing up Sibelius news? |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:16:22 +0100 |
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 6:51 PM, address@hidden
<address@hidden> wrote:
> This is a great idea. What'd I'd recommend is doing a "natural" version and
> a version with lots of tweaks.
> If you define all the tweaks in a separate file, then all you need to do is
> sub that file with one that has empty definitions.
> This will help developers know how far LilyPond is from automating certain
> decisions.
That's not a bad idea (saving tweaks separately), but what about
fousing on clearly separating commits that introduce tweaks? I.e.
enter all music first (to avoid conflicts later on), and then add
corrections; by filtering out particular commits it would be easy to
get a view of the piece at various stages of "beautification". For
example, take a look at
https://github.com/janek-warchol/eja-mater-demonstration .
best,
Janek
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, (continued)
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/03/02
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Jethro Van Thuyne, 2013/03/02
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/03/02
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Urs Liska, 2013/03/02
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/03/04
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/03/02
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, address@hidden, 2013/03/02
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Urs Liska, 2013/03/04
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Janek Warchoł, 2013/03/04
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Francisco Vila, 2013/03/02
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Francisco Vila, 2013/03/02
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Noeck, 2013/03/02
Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, Urs Liska, 2013/03/02