Re: R shorthand

[David Kastrup]

Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi David,
>
>> I gave the answer previously, including the rationale.  Since it was
>> tactfully being ignored, it seemed to require more emphasis.
>> Otherwise I would likely have been blamed for ignoring users' wishes
>> in spite of them reaching perfect agreement.
>
> So to be perfectly clear: You can see no way to implement any sort of
> shorthand which saves the user having to know (and potentially return
> to modify, time and time again) the "current measure duration"?

Quite so.

-- 
David Kastrup