[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: User comments on R shorthand
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: User comments on R shorthand |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:18:12 -0400 |
Hi David,
> See page 3, at the bottom, for two, three, and
> four measure rests. (I'm obliged to cite and give
> credit for the scans.} How can these be implemented
> without R2, R3, and R4?
Assuming that staff is in 4/4 time (there is no time signature currently), then
R1*2, R1*3, and R1*4 should work perfectly — do they not work for you?
> There should be no problem detecting the measure lengths.
That does seem intuitively true…
However, David K. (who knows way more about this than any of us) says it's
false — I trust his judgement/opinion, until seeing concrete evidence to the
contrary.
Thanks,
Kieren.
- User comments on R shorthand, James Harkins, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, David Raleigh Arnold, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand,
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Phil Holmes, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, David Kastrup, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/21
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, David Kastrup, 2013/03/21
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Janek Warchoł, 2013/03/21
Re: User comments on R shorthand, Noeck, 2013/03/20
Re: User comments on R shorthand, Olivier Biot, 2013/03/23
Re: User comments on R shorthand, Wilbert Berendsen, 2013/03/24