Re: User comments on R shorthand

[Noeck]

Am 20.03.2013 19:11, schrieb David Raleigh Arnold:
> A way of indicating the number of
> measures rested by a number in the score
> should of course remain, but R2, R3, and
> R4 should be implemented as shown on page 3.

That is perfectly possible right now (and for a very long time):
R1*2 R1*3 R1*4 (for 4/4 measures and others analogue).

The discussion is about whether the duration of a measure must be specified.

Cheers,
Joram