Re: User comments on R shorthand

[David Kastrup]

"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:

> [Snip possibly final comments.]
>
> I've read all the emails on this, and personally agree that R*5 for 5
> FMRs of whatever time sig would be a step forward.  Whether this is
> easy or difficult to implement is irrelevant to the way we handle
> enhancement requests.
>
> Kieren - suggest you send an enhancement request to -bugs.

If it is entered into the tracker, I strongly suggest adding a link to
my mail with the LilyPond example for a startling bar count.  It might
keep people from wasting unnecessary time due to underestimating the
problem.

-- 
David Kastrup