Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break

[Richard Shann]

On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 14:50 +0100, Noeck wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> > There is still something not said here: by default LilyPond is printing
> > two accidentals in the measure following the line break in the example I
> > posted. 
> 
> It is. 

Sorry, yes, you are quite right
(though perhaps my contribution makes it clear that there is not even a
foolproof workaround for the current behavior to bring it in line with
Gould and the consensus).

Richard