|
From: | Anthonys Lists |
Subject: | Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL |
Date: | Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:25:13 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 |
On 02/04/2013 23:46, David Kastrup wrote:
That wasn't what the lawsuit was about. It was not even what Oracle claimed the lawsuit to be about. The issue was the reimplementation of Java classes, not the_use_ of Java classes.
Yes.But the only thing that Oracle could sue over was the use of the api's. Which would not only block re-implementation, but would also block using any implementation. Which is the problem here ...
Cheers, Wol
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |