[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper
From: |
Peter Wannemacher |
Subject: |
re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Apr 2013 08:17:02 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper
From: Urs Liska
Subject: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 23:17:08 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329
Thunderbird/17.0.5
Hi,
I like the tone of the paper, but I think it might be a bit long.
I have some grammatical observations below. I will make more if they are
helpful.
======================
You wrote on page 4:
Editor independent
There isn’t a inseparable unit between editing and processing a docu-
It is common to write:
There isn't an inseparable unit
========================
In-place comments
Practically all plain text formats allow to enter comments inside the
I would write:
Practically all plain text formats allow you to enter comments inside the
or
Practically all plain text formats allow one to enter comments inside the
or
Practically all plain text formats allow the user to enter comments
inside the
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, (continued)
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Urs Liska, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, David Kastrup, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Carl Peterson, 2013/04/22
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Christ van Willegen, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, David Kastrup, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2013/04/24
re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper,
Peter Wannemacher <=
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Klaus Föhl, 2013/04/22
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Klaus Föhl, 2013/04/22
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Klaus Föhl, 2013/04/23
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Klaus Föhl, 2013/04/23