[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper
From: |
Klaus Föhl |
Subject: |
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:26:39 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
David Kastrup writes:
> Likely at best halfways. For example, no header is contained in the
> hypothetical "music output stream". Things like \transpose don't make
> it into the "music output stream" but rather just its results.
>
> Which may be enough for some workflows, but not necessary all. It does
> provide more information than the Midi.
Which is the absolute minimum.
Cross-referencing to that Frankfurt meeting: one problem described
to have happened at one point was that midi had turned staccato
into brief note -rest -brief note.
Not entirely sure whether that was the educational example.
Neither sure either whether such rather simple problems persist
in publishers' lives.
Cheers
Klaus
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, (continued)
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, David Kastrup, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Carl Peterson, 2013/04/22
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Christ van Willegen, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, David Kastrup, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2013/04/24
re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Peter Wannemacher, 2013/04/21
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Klaus Föhl, 2013/04/22
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Klaus Föhl, 2013/04/22
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper,
Klaus Föhl <=
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Klaus Föhl, 2013/04/23