[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:50:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Klaus Föhl <address@hidden> writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>> Likely at best halfways. For example, no header is contained in the
>> hypothetical "music output stream". Things like \transpose don't make
>> it into the "music output stream" but rather just its results.
>>
>> Which may be enough for some workflows, but not necessary all. It does
>> provide more information than the Midi.
>
> Which is the absolute minimum.
>
> Cross-referencing to that Frankfurt meeting: one problem described
> to have happened at one point was that midi had turned staccato
> into brief note -rest -brief note.
Well, that's the fault of the Midi backend. The music stream still has
the staccato information.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, (continued)
re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Peter Wannemacher, 2013/04/21
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Klaus Föhl, 2013/04/22
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Klaus Föhl, 2013/04/22
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Klaus Föhl, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper,
David Kastrup <=
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Klaus Föhl, 2013/04/23