[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MusicXML
|
From: |
David Pirotte |
|
Subject: |
Re: MusicXML |
|
Date: |
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:20:20 -0300 |
> Doing it in scheme does seem to offer some nice advantages. I looked into it
> and
> found that there's SXML, a scheme version of XML:
for info [in guile 2]:
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/SXML.html#SXML
what is the priority of lilypond being built upon guile-2, if there still is,
and
if, how far is lilypond from effectively being built upon guile-2 ?
(david pirotte)
- Re: MusicXML, (continued)
- Re: MusicXML, address@hidden, 2013/04/23
- Re: MusicXML, Urs Liska, 2013/04/23
- Re: MusicXML, Urs Liska, 2013/04/23
- Re: MusicXML, Noeck, 2013/04/23
- Re: MusicXML, Vaughan McAlley, 2013/04/23
- Re: MusicXML, address@hidden, 2013/04/24
- Re: MusicXML, Paul Morris, 2013/04/25
- Re: MusicXML, Urs Liska, 2013/04/25
- Re: MusicXML, David Kastrup, 2013/04/25
- Re: MusicXML,
David Pirotte <=
Re: MusicXML, Paul Morris, 2013/04/23