Re: many users don't know about \shape

[Alberto Simões]

On 10/05/13 14:55, David Kastrup wrote:
> Alberto Simões <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On 10/05/13 14:42, David Nalesnik wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alberto Simões
> > > <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >      Probably the fact that I am running 2.16. Updating.
> > >
> > >
> > > \shape will in fact work with 2.16.  You just need to use a different
> > > ordering of the arguments:
> > >
> > > \shape Slur #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0))
> > >
> > > (The reason the order of the arguments was changed in later versions is
> > > to allow the command to work as a tweak, too.)
> >
> > Updated, thanks :)
>
> Well, 2.17 is slowly shaping up towards the next stable release, even
> though the amount of recently discovered regressions and finetuning is
> not really encouraging.  On the other hand, you should probably not miss
> the opportunity to find and report your own regressions: they won't
> disappear unless someone trips over them and hollers.

My musics are extremely simple, but I'll let you know in case I step in 
some problem.

For those interested in the \shape usage, this is what I was working in:
 http://www.musica-liturgica.net/viewfull.pl/375

Best
Alberto